home about sciencentral contact
sciencentral news : making sense of science
life sciences physical sciences technology full archive
spacebiotechnologyengineeringcomputersnanotechnology
February 9, 2010
ScienCentral

Sex Cells


Post/Bookmark this story:

Search (Archive Only)
 

One Healthy Baby (6.17.03) - Solutions to infertility often lead to multiple births, which can be hard on the mother and the children. But doctors may have found a way to help parents have just one healthy baby.

Cloning Ban (3.18.03) - The House has already approved a ban on all human cloning. Now the science community is weighing in on the debate.

Egg Regs (11.26.02) - Thousands of women donate their eggs for infertile couples, but eggs also hold the promise of cures for many diseases. Now as the demand for eggs grows, women’s health advocates are already worrying about how to protect egg donors.

  American Society for Reproductive Medicine

First Test-tube Baby Celebrates 25th Birthday



   07.29.03
email to a friend
 
 
play video Video
CU petri dish
(movie will open in a separate window)
Choose your format:
Quicktime
Realmedia

Reports of fertility researchers creating an embryo that was both male and female show the 25-year-old in vitro fertilization industry is still fertile ground for controversy. In this ScienCentral News video, the scientist behind the experiment explains why he did it.

Controversial Embryo

It's been 25 years since the first "test-tube" baby was born, and throughout that quarter of a century, in vitro fertilization, or IVF, has helped millions of people have children. "When IVF first started, there was a lot of opposition to the concept of creating a quote-unquote human being outside of the body," says Dr. Norbert Gleicher, founder of the Center for Human Reproduction. "Some people felt it was the end of the world, and look how far we have come."

But some of the research in this industry, which is self-regulated because it does not receive government funding, is still controversial. Gleicher recently transplanted male cells into three-day-old female embryos, and grew the hybrid in a lab for six days before destroying it. "We came up with the idea that if we took a male cell and transplanted the male cell into the female embryo, that would give us a tool to follow an offspring's cells through the developing embryo, because the male has XY chromosomes, and the female has only XX," says Gleicher.





Gleicher says that his experiment showed that cells from a sibling could be transplanted into an embryo to prevent certain genetic diseases caused by a single defective gene, such as severe combined immunodeficiency (SCIDs), otherwise known as "bubble boy disease." Gleicher believes that as with other IVF advances, time will show that his research will have led to curing many single-gene diseases. "So the purpose of our experiment was not…to create a mixture of a female or male embryo. That was just a tool to answer the question whether the transplant worked."

Both scientists and ethicists have criticized Gleicher's methods. "I don't know whether Gleicher's research was unethical or not, I'm not saying that," says Dr. Thomas Murray, director of the Hastings Center a bioethics research institute. "But…if it was possible to do the experiment in other ways, then it was both unwise and unnecessary for the scientist to make a hybrid embryo, part male, part female."




pipetting
"This research went through an ethics committee, to an institutional review board, before it was conducted," Gleicher points out. "We used embryos that were specially donated for this purpose and that had been frozen. This experiment was performed in a totally ethical and legal fashion."

Gleicher presented his research at the recent meeting in Madrid of the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology, the largest gathering of fertility specialists in Europe, and it was chosen as a finalist for an award. "And indeed, we were told by our committee members that it came down to our paper and another paper, and that they decided to give the award to the other paper because they didn't want the publicity," says Gleicher.

But Murray says Gleicher shouldn't have been surprised that the society of fertility specialists denounced his research. "Any responsible scientist would have been aware, if you combine female cells and male cells into a human embryo, you're going to get a lot of public attention to that, and a lot of it is going to be critical," says Murray. "People are frightened enough about what goes on in scientific laboratories…that public reaction just increases people's mistrust of science, and that can't be a benefit to anyone."

Gleicher's work was funded by the Center for Human Reproduction and the Foundation for Reproductive Medicine.


 
       email to a friend by Karen Lurie
               
     


Science Videos     Terms of Use     Privacy Policy     Site Map      Contact      About
 
ScienCentral News is a production of ScienCentral, Inc. in collaboration with The Center for Science and the Media 248 West 35th St., 17th Fl., NY, NY 10001 USA (212) 244-9577. The contents of these WWW sites © ScienCentral, 2000-2010. All rights reserved. This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. ESI-0206184. The views expressed in this website are not necessarily those of The National Science Foundation or any of our other sponsors. Image Credits National Science Foundation