home about sciencentral contact
sciencentral news
life sciences physical sciences technology full archive
biologygeneticshealthbraineducationanimalspsychology
February 9, 2010
ScienCentral

Muscle Boy


Post/Bookmark this story:

Search (Archive Only)
 

Genetically Altered Athletes (06.14.04) - Scientists are raising concerns about what they call the future of performance enhancement—genetic doping.

Teen Steroids (2.17.04) - Eager to emulate their favorite athletes, as many as 1 in 18 teens may have tried steroids. But at what cost?

 

What is Gene Therapy?

Bioethics Resources on the Web



   07.01.04
email to a friend
 
 
play video Video
boy
image: New England Journal of Medicine
(movie will open in a separate window)
Choose your format:
Quicktime
Realmedia

The report of a boy born with big muscles in Germany is adding new fuel to the sports doping debate. This ScienCentral News video has more.

Manipulating Muscle

Genetics researchers reported in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) that an abnormally muscular boy born in Germany has a mutation in a gene called myostatin that normally limits muscle growth.

The boy, who is now four and a half years old, was born with unusually well-developed muscles. Markus Schuelke, neuropediatrician at Charite University Medical Center in Berlin and the lead author of the NEJM report, examined the boy when he was just a few days old and suspected he had the mutation.

Schuelke contacted Se-Jin Lee, molecular genetics and biology professor at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, whose lab first discovered the mutation in 1997 when they genetically engineered "mighty mice" that lacked the myostatin gene. They also found a naturally-occuring example of it in "double-muscled" beef cattle.





"This report is significant because it shows for the very first time conclusively that myostatin does play an important role in regulating muscle growth in humans, as we already knew to be the case in both mice and in cattle," says Lee, who is a co-author of the report.

Schuelke says the mutation is "probably quite rare and we were just happy to find it." He says other scientists have searched for myostatin mutations in samples of athletes and so far failed to find any.





Lee says that DNA tests showed the German boy's mother, a former professional sprinter, lacks one copy of the gene, while the child lacks both copies. "If you lack just a single copy of the myostatin gene, you have increased amount of muscle, but not as much as if you lack both copies," says Lee. "So in other words, the effect of myostatin is almost certainly dose-dependent; that is, if you have some function, then you have a certain amount of muscle, and if you have a reduced amount of that, then you have even more muscle."

This means that therapies that even partially block the effect of myostatin could increase muscle strength. "It certainly makes us very optimistic in terms of further pursuing this area of research for the treatment of muscle-wasting diseases," says Lee.

Wyeth pharmaceutical company recently started Phase I clinical trials of a myostatin blocker to treat muscle-wasting diseases. In Phase I trials the drug is tested for safety in healthy adults.

mouse
Genetically engineered mouse
Mice genetically engineered to lack both copies of the gene "have about twice as much muscle mass as the normal mouse," says Lee. "These mice are stronger, they can pull more weight, but otherwise, they seem to be healthy...they have a normal lifespan, they can reproduce."




Schuelke says the boy seems healthy and with clothes on "you wouldn't notice him walking down the street. But his bare muscles are much more prominent and he has much less subcutaneous fat" than a normal child. "So far he is well, we've checked him regularly," says Schuelke, "but there are diseases that show up later in life, so we can't predict" his future health since he is the first proven human case.

Clouding the Doping Debate

Schuelke says in addition to DNA testing, researchers at Wyeth Pharmaceuticals developed a test for detecting myostatin in human blood. "Testing for myostatin in humans is much more difficult than in animals, because humans have much lower circulating levels" of myostatin, Schuelke explains.

Could athletes suspected of using performance-enhancing drugs use such a test to prove they are natural? "We can now measure it in an athlete and get a number, but what do we compare it to?" says Schuelke. "We first have to establish what's normal to know what an athlete's values mean." He says he's working with the Wyeth scientists to collect samples to determine that.

University of Pennsylvania gene therapy researcher Lee Sweeney, whose own studies on mice convinced him that athletes may be tempted to tamper with their own DNA, worries that the new genetic therapies will find their way into professional sports. He wrote in the July issue of Scientific American about the "natural advantage" the myostatin mutation provides.

"There are going to be people who are carrying these mutations that give them unusual athletic abilities without the need to do the same level of training as an average person," he says. "If I was a weightlifter and competing against someone who is not making any myostatin because of a mutation in his genes, then I think I might want to file a protest that that person has an unfair genetic advantage even though they inherited it."

In fact, Sweeney predicts that as gene therapy becomes widespread it could be tougher to argue that athletes shouldn't have access to it. "I think as this becomes more widely known that athletes are competing against people who have naturally occurring mutations that are clearly a genetic advantage to them, that they're going to say that this gene enhancement or gene doping is not an unfair thing," he says. He predicts some will argue "'it's unfair to not let me have it because now I'm competing against people whose parents gave them these things naturally, and mine didn't, and…I want the same enhancement in my genes so that I can actually compete with them in a fair manner'. Then the debate becomes really cloudy and interesting for the bioethicists."

This research appeared in the June 24, 2004 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, and was funded by Helft dem Muskelkranken Kind (Hamburg, Germany) and National Institutes of Health (NIH).


 
       email to a friend by Joyce Gramza
               
     


Science Videos     Terms of Use     Privacy Policy     Site Map      Contact      About
 
ScienCentral News is a production of ScienCentral, Inc. in collaboration with The Center for Science and the Media 248 West 35th St., 17th Fl., NY, NY 10001 USA (212) 244-9577. The contents of these WWW sites © ScienCentral, 2000-2010. All rights reserved. This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. ESI-0206184. The views expressed in this website are not necessarily those of The National Science Foundation or any of our other sponsors. Image Credits National Science Foundation