home about sciencentral contact
sciencentral news: making sense of science
life sciences physi cal sciences technology full archive
astronomychemistryearthmaterialsphysicsclimateoceans
February 9, 2010
ScienCentral

Price of Gas


Post/Bookmark this story:

Search (Archive Only)
  Traffic Costs
(12.17.04) - If it seems like all you do is sit in traffic, it'll likely be worse this holiday season. Researchers say we're wasting more time in traffic than ever before — costing us huge amounts of money.

Side Impact Crashes (08.31.04) - As you hit the road this Labor Day weekend you might want to ask whether your vehicle has side impact airbags that protect the head. Traumatic head injury is now being recognized as a big risk in side impact crashes.

Driving While Distracted (06.29.04) - Researchers are finding out why talking on a cell phone impairs driving.

 

Yahoo Maps Show Live Traffic Conditions

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration



   07.28.05
email to a friend
 
 
play video Video
traffic
image: Texas Transportation Institute
(movie will open in a separate window)
Choose your format:
Quicktime
Realmedia

You know that driving or sitting in traffic wastes time and natural resources. But, as this ScienCentral News video explains, scientists now know better than ever just how big of a waste it is.

Plant Power

Whether jumping in the car to head to the beach for the weekend, or just around the corner to pick up some groceries, Americans are wasting more time in traffic than ever.

"We get in our automobile for almost any reason," says transport researcher David Schrank from Texas A&M University. "Drive to the corner store for a gallon of milk or drive to the cleaners and we may make those as two separate trips, not two trips back to back."

In the 2005 Annual Urban Mobility Report — a yearly traffic assessment of 85 urban areas across the United States — Shrank and his colleagues at the Texas Transportation Institute reported that U.S. drivers are now spending more time than ever behind the wheel, racking up around 63 billion dollars in lost time and gasoline.





"Travel in the U.S. has increased roughly 80 or 90 percent over the last twenty years," Schrank points out.

But time and money are not the only things wasted when sitting in traffic. One researcher has worked out how much of the earth's ancient natural resources it took to make the gallons you're guzzling.





Incredibly, University of Massachusetts Boston ecologist Jeffrey Dukes estimated that it took more than a hundred tons of fossilized plant matter — close to the typical 104-ton payload of the Space Shuttle — to make a single gallon of the gas.

"It's an enormous amount of ancient plant matter that went into every single gallon of gasoline that we burn today," says Dukes.




Pumping gas
Dukes began his study after an odyssey out West. "I was looking out the window and thinking about the gasoline that we were burning in this big, Chevy suburban," he says. "And I was thinking, 'My Gosh, where does all that come from?' And I realized I didn't know… I thought that I could just go back to my desk after this trip was over and get on the web."

No dice. Dukes dug, but every query came up empty. That's when the sleuthing started. "I had to draw information from lots of different fields, from geology, from petroleum industry records, from biogeochemical journals, from ocean journals," he says. Once he culled enough data — like measures of fixed and stored carbon used to make energy — Dukes organized the information with mathematical formulas that generated estimates of how much ancient matter make up fossil fuels, like oil, coal and natural gas, that we use today.

The process started with photosynthesis, millions of years ago, when plants turn sunlight into chemical energy. "[Plants] have these natural antennae that essentially capture solar energy and allow them to do things with it," says Dukes. "They incorporate the carbon from carbon dioxide into their own structure." But there's a hitch. "When you look at how efficient [plants] are at capturing solar energy it turns out that they are only about one to two percent efficient," he says, not nearly good enough to keep us energy consumers sated.

Hard to believe, but this fairly inefficient natural process is what's behind the revving of our global engine; however, nature seemed to take care of us by providing plenty of pockets of trapped energy. Think gas by way of example. We have stores from phytoplankton — tiny plants that float in the ocean — that died and settled in seafloor sediment millions of years ago. Over time, the mixture formed kerogen, a rock-like substance that converts to hydrocarbons, raw materials used in fuel production.

Hybrid car
Hybrid car
image: Ballard Power Systems
The problem is, we're blowing through our cache way too fast. We've burned "the amount of fossil fuel that would have come from all the plants on Earth for 13,300 years" in less than 300 years. Scary, considering that these deposits — 83 percent of which Dukes says power the world — are finite. "We've got this bank account of solar energy that we're drawing on like crazy," he says. "And we don't really know how big the account is. We don't know how much we're spending, how fast we're spending and when we're going to run out. There are going to be some real consequences of running out... so, when you're sitting there pumping gas, it might be good to think about what future generations are going to do when… it's no longer feasible to use these fossil fuels because of environmental consequences [like global warming]. How are we going to get around then?"

Right now, the pinch they'll one day feel when developing giants like China and India dip further into the world's fuel supply isn't too injurious. But Dukes warns: "We're going to have increasing political issues as we continue to depend on fossil fuels. So, there are many reasons, from the environmental and the national security point of view, that we should be switching away from fossil fuels as quickly as we can."

Much to what Dukes says is his dismay, change isn't happening fast enough. "There haven't been people in this country that have really wanted to… lead us out of our current dependence on fossil fuel into a new, reduced fossil fuel economy. And I don't think that that's going to take much to change. I just think we need a couple of people to step forward and say, 'This is the direction we need to go.'"

In such a leader's absence, drivers, you may want to think twice before starting your engines.


 
       email to a friend by Lindsay Carswell and Stacey Young
               
     


Science Videos     Terms of Use     Privacy Policy     Site Map      Contact      About
 
ScienCentral News is a production of ScienCentral, Inc. in collaboration with The Center for Science and the Media 248 West 35th St., 17th Fl., NY, NY 10001 USA (212) 244-9577. The contents of these WWW sites © ScienCentral, 2000-2010. All rights reserved. This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. ESI-0206184. The views expressed in this website are not necessarily those of The National Science Foundation or any of our other sponsors. Image Credits National Science Foundation