home about sciencentral contact
sciencentral news
life sciences physical sciences technology full archive
biologygeneticshealthbraineducationanimalspsychology
February 9, 2010
ScienCentral

Negativity is Contagious: Science Sensei 5


Post/Bookmark this story:

Search (Archive Only)
 

Science Sensei 4
(11/14/07).

Science Sensei 3
(11/07/07)

Science Sensei 2
(10/31/07)

Science Sensei 1
(10/23/07)

 

digg

Journal of Consumer Research



   11.28.07
email to a friend
 
 

This week, Science Sensei investigates why you should be wary of the negative reviews you read online (especially the ones about his show).

If no video window appears below, you can visit the ScienCentral News channel on YouTube. Or if you prefer a higher-quality widescreen mp4 video, please view it here or use our RSS feed. For more information on the research covered, read below the video.

Don't Be Cruel

The Wikipedia entry for the term "ochlocracy," from the Latin ochlocratia, says it means "government by mob or a mass of people, or the intimidation of constitutional authorities. In English, the word mobocracy is sometimes used as a synonym. As a pejorative for majoritarianism, it's akin to the Latin phrase mobile vulgus meaning 'the easily moveable crowd.'"

Now researchers at Indiana University have found that the certain parts of the internet might be a breeding ground for mobile vulgus. Many sites and blogs now offer a democratic, often unfiltered, forum where anyone can leave comments and speak their mind. The researchers, Adam Duhachek, Shuoyang Zhang, and Shanker Krishnan, wanted to know what kind of influence these forums might have on people's attitudes. A series of experiments helped them conclude that negativity may be more contagious and influential than posivitivity.





The researchers presented volunteers (college students) with information about a new product — specifically a study guide for a college course. Some had a negative view of the guide, and others had a positive opinion of it. Then the students were given one of two sets of other people's reviews of the study guide — there was a negative review set and a positive review set.




When the researchers measured the degree to which people's opinions changed, they found that the largest effect was among people who had a positive opinion, but were given negative reviews.

The researchers then ran the experiment, except the students were told that their opinions would be made public, as part of a group interaction, rather private. When the researchers measured the degree to which people's opinions changed among these groups, the largest effect was among people who had a negative opinion and were given negative reviews: Their opinions became even more negative.

The researchers say that in a digital world where the ability to read or submit opinions on nearly anything is a mouse click away, this psychological affect of seeming to be more susceptible to negative opinions may loom large. They say people should be aware of the biases that might exist in their own mind, and that marketers may need to expend extra resources to combat the effect.

The study was published in the October 2007 issue of the Journal of Consumer Research, and it received funding from the 3M Corporation


 
       email to a friend by Brad Kloza
               
     


Science Videos     Terms of Use     Privacy Policy     Site Map      Contact      About
 
ScienCentral News is a production of ScienCentral, Inc. in collaboration with The Center for Science and the Media 248 West 35th St., 17th Fl., NY, NY 10001 USA (212) 244-9577. The contents of these WWW sites © ScienCentral, 2000-2010. All rights reserved. This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. ESI-0515449 The views expressed in this website are not necessarily those of The National Science Foundation or any of our other sponsors. Image Credits National Science Foundation