home about sciencentral contact
sciencentral news
life sciences physical sciences technology full archive
biologygeneticshealthbraineducationanimalspsychology
January 4, 2011
ScienCentral

Generosity Hormone


Post/Bookmark this story:

Search (Archive Only)
  Marketing mind games can drain your wallet (12/12/07)

A Mother's Touch (5/12/06)

Wishful Seeing (8/17/06)

  Philanthropy statistics

"Scrooge or Samaritan?" How personality affects giving-- University of Kent

What is Neuroeconomics?



   12.24.07
email to a friend
 
 
Video
(movie will open in a separate window)
Quicktime

Scientists have found that a hormone makes people more generous. As this ScienCentral News video explains, it's a brain hormone, and it even makes people more generous to strangers.

Ho-Ho Hormone?

It makes sense to get joy out of giving to our loved ones, but we're also often generous to complete strangers. Now Claremont Graduate University neuroeconomist Paul Zak has found that dosing people with the so-called "cuddle hormone," oxytocin, makes them more generous to strangers.

"I think of oxytocin as pushing on the empathy lever in the brain," Zak says. "As we push on that lever we saw this fantastic increase in generosity of real money to a complete stranger."

In the experiments, college students were given ten dollars of real money they could keep, but then played a computer game in which they were asked to share some of it with a stranger. While they couldn't see or hear the stranger, the task did force them to put themselves in the strangers' place.





"We said, 'If you gave money, how much would you give.?' And, "If you received it and you have a chance to reject how much you were given because it was just too stingy, how much would you accept? What's the smallest amount you would accept?'"

He wrote in the journal PLoS One that subjects who got a snort of oxytocin gave 80-percent more money than those who inhaled just a saline solution.





"That's substantial-- that's actually real money that you could go and buy lunch with, but indeed you gave to a stranger," says Zak, pointing out that he conducted the experiments at UCLA.

"We do these at UCLA because there's great heterogeneity in the subject pool. There's a large student population and they vary by major, by ethnicity; we don't recruit from a class so there's a great cross-section of individuals," he says.

He says the effect extended all across this cross-section. "Subjects who were generous in this experiment walked out of the lab with less money. And yet they did report they were less unhappy," says Zak. "They were equally as happy as people who walked out of the lab with more money. So generosity occurs because we're a social species and we care about the welfare of other people, in this case even complete strangers."

Empathy Versus Altruism




"The only reason this works is because we've asked you to take the other person's perspective. So we had this control task in which we didn't ask you to take the other person's perspective, and oxytocin had no effect," Zak says. "We do have some baseline altruism, so we found that a bit of the generosity was predicted by altruism, but empathy was quantitatively twice as important as baseline altruism.

"So it's really empathy and not altruism that seems to drive charitable giving," he says. "Now we understand why people actually give money to the Salvation Army when they leave their local store at Christmastime, why they give money to hurricane victims. We do that because we feel for them, we feel empathy for them.

In his controlled experiments, Zak deliberately removed any natural stimulators of oxytocin and empathy, and used artificial oxytocin to "push on the empathy lever" of some participants.

But he points out that there are many natural ways to boost our oxytocin levels-- including giving itself.

"We're being generous with others and we're releasing oxytocin in ourselves and in other people and we get great enjoyment from that," he says. He adds that it's well-known that hugging and cuddling also release the hormone but says so does sharing a meal with others.

"The rituals of the holidays, which often include many meals, is an important part of the bonding that we have between those friends and family that join us," he says.

Interestingly, Zak found that oxytocin had no effect on two percent of the participants and that these students fit the personality profile of sociopaths.

"If we infuse oxytocin into their brains, it has no effect on their behavior, so they're not generous at all," Zak says, claiming, "That's a good thing. It tells us there are individuals out there who are not people we want to interact with and we should be careful when we're having to trust another person and we should direct our generosity towards those who really need it."

This research was published online in PLoS One, November 2007, and funded by The Seaver Institute and the John Templeton Foundation.


 
       email to a friend by Joyce Gramza
               
     


Science Videos     Terms of Use     Privacy Policy     Site Map      Contact      About
 
ScienCentral News is a production of ScienCentral, Inc. in collaboration with The Center for Science and the Media 248 West 35th St., 17th Fl., NY, NY 10001 USA (212) 244-9577. The contents of these WWW sites © ScienCentral, 2000-2011. All rights reserved. This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. ESI-0515449 The views expressed in this website are not necessarily those of The National Science Foundation or any of our other sponsors. Image Credits National Science Foundation