ScienCentral News
 
environment general science genetics health and medicine space technology April 29, 2003 
home NOVA News Minutes archive login

is a production of
ScienCentral, Inc.
Making Sense of Science

Also of Interest
Focus on Space

NEARly Done

Space School

Faster, Better, Cheaper?

3-D Universe

Compton Comes Down

Space Station Slowdown

Fly Me To The Moon

Mars Moisture Mystery

Great Balls Of Fire

Cosmic Cutbacks

Comet, Come Home

Science, Sealed and Delivered

NOVA News Minutes
Visit the NOVA News Minutes archive.
ScienCentral News and Nature
Nature genome promo logo
Don’t miss Enter the Genome
our collaboration with Nature.
Best of the Web!
Popular Science Best of the Web 2000
Selected one of Popular Science’s 50 Best of the Web.
Get Email Updates
Write to us and we will send you an email when a new feature appears on the site.
Christmas Star (video)
December 18, 2001

Also on ScienCentral News

Focus on Space - Never before seen features of planets and images of stars at the center of our galaxy are now coming into focus thanks to recent advances in adaptive optics. (2/6/01)

Northern Lights - While beautiful to look at, auroras—those captivating displays of light that can be seen in the night sky over the Earth’s polar regions—have confounded scientists trying to explain what causes them. But after 50 years of debate, there finally is an answer—auroras are visible effects of space storms. (5/31/00)

Elsewhere on the web

Common Errors in "Star of Bethlehem" Planetarium Shows

The Star of Bethlehem: An Astronomical Perspective - from Nick Strobel’s astronomynotes.com

What was the star? - A Christian site with a lot of in-depth research

The Official Town of Bethlehem tourism site


Could one astronomer’s interest in ancient coins provide a clue about the Star of Bethlehem?

This ScienCentral News video reports.


What was the "star"?

Through the centuries efforts to find a natural explanation for the Star of Bethlehem have tended to get tangled up in questions of faith. For example, one recent astronomical analysis sets out to identify the star but ends in using it as a clue to the date of Jesus’ birth, just as the Magi did in Matthew’s New Testament account.

"Let the Bible be the Bible! It’s not about science," wrote famed science author Martin Gardner about theories that the star’s appearance to the Magi was a real physical event.

While that is certainly one approach which satisfies believers and nonbelievers alike, astronomer Michael Molnar thinks he’s found an even more agreeable solution. His serendipitous investigation is thoroughly nonsecular. "If you’d asked me some 10 years ago whether I would be talking about the Star of Bethlehem, I would be laughing, because I always thought that the Star of Bethlehem was one of these great mysteries that never could be solved," says Molnar. "I only got interested in it because of the ancient Roman coin, that I had a new clue about what happened in the skies, and this was a clue that no one else had realized existed."

Molnar scorns the assumption that the star was a spectacular sight. "My colleagues, fellow astronomers, had looked for bright celestial objects... very much what you would find in, say, a movie or on television," he says. "But they really haven’t investigated closely enough what the ancient people were reporting in the skies as being important."

The ancient coin not only led him to the constellation of Aries the Ram for the event’s location, it caused him to rethink the question.

Molnar realized that "we have to really look to astrology for the answer--that is, astrology as it was practiced during those times. I’m an astronomer, I do not practise astrology, but I had to learn what the astrology was of Roman times. And therein lies the answer to the Star of Bethlehem."

Here’s how Molnar’s theory stacks up against leading modern contenders.

  • In his 1991 book Ernest Martin argued that the star was a conjunction of Jupiter and Venus in 3 BC, a theory endorsed in many holiday star shows now playing at planetariums everywhere. Molnar, however, says that while patterns of planetary movements like this "had astrological meanings... if we again look at the ancient records we find that they did not relate necessarily to the birth of a great king in Judea," according to astrologers of the time. Molnar identifies an event in Aries, which he claims is the only correct symbol of Judea.
  • Modern astronomers have pretty much decided that the star was not a comet or a supernova. Molnar agrees, but his reasoning is not based on a lack of astronomical candidates, but on primary manuscripts. "Comets were not the indication of the birth of a king," Molnar says. In fact, "they were held as being an evil omen." And "if we look to the records for sudden stars that appeared in the sky and then disappeared, these things were never related to the birth of a great king."
  • While Molnar rejects any theories that involve "celestial pyrotechnics," they continue to be proposed by his colleagues. Mark Kidger’s 1999 book concludes the star was a nova recorded by Chinese astronomers. "A very faint nova, I might point out,"says Molnar. And one illustrious astronomer, Sir Patrick Moore, claims that the star must have been a meteor shower.

Molnar’s book, The Star of Bethlehem, The Legacy of the Magi was published last year. Is the origin of the star’s legend now settled? A new round of planetarium shows incorporating his arguments has yet to be produced.



by Joyce Gramza


About Search Login Help Webmaster
ScienCentral News is a production of ScienCentral, Inc.
in collaboration with the Center for Science and the Media.
248 West 35th St., 17th Fl., NY, NY 10001 USA (212) 244-9577.
The contents of these WWW sites © ScienCentral, 2000-2003. All rights reserved.
The views expressed in this website are not necessarily those of the NSF.
NOVA News Minutes and NOVA are registered trademarks of WGBH Educational Foundation and are being used under license.