Faster Fatteners
by Christopher Bergendorff |
September 2nd, 2008 |
Published in
All, Health
Stumble |
Share on Facebook |
Tweet This |
[If you cannot see the flash video below, you can click here for a high quality mp4 video.]
|
Interviewees: Elizabeth Parks, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center |
Fattening Fructose
From cereal to soda, from beans to bread, fructose from high fructose corn syrup has worked its way into much of the American diet.
“It’s put in absolutely everything. It’s in ketchup, it’s in crackers, it’s in bread, it’s in anything you can think of,” says nutritionist and author Marion Nestle. “We like things sweet.”
Now scientists are finding that fructose could be making us fatter, faster.
“There’s lots of studies in animals that show that fructose, compared to other sugars, can be made into body fat very quickly,” says Elizabeth Parks, clinical nutrition researcher at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
But do those animal studies apply to people? Parks, who specializes in how diet affects the creation of fat in the body, designed a study to find out.
As she wrote in “The Journal of Nutrition,” Parks and her team put healthy volunteers on the same regulated diet, and gave them different sugary drinks on three separate days. The drinks contained different amounts of fructose and the simpler sugar, glucose.
One drink solution contained a mixture of 50 percent fructose, and 50 percent glucose. Another solution contained 75 percent fructose, and only 25 percent glucose. The last drink solution contained all glucose, and no fructose. On the experiment day, the participants drank the solution in the morning, and hours later they were tested to see how much fat had built up in their bodies.
But how did they know whether the fat was coming from the fructose or something else in their diet?
As Parks explains, “When we see a fat in the body, we can tell if that fatty acid was made from a carbohydrate… versus a fat in the body that came in as a pre-formed fat, such as oils or butter.” Sugars, like fructose, are also classified as carbohydrates.
Once they knew where the fat was coming from, they were ready to see whether the amount of fructose really did have an effect on the build-up of fat. What they found was startling.
“When fructose was present in the sweet drink,” says Parks, “whether it was at 50 percent of its concentration, or 75 percent, we found that the fat synthesis rate was more than twice, almost three times the rate than when we just fed glucose alone.”
Sweet Nutrition
What does this mean for the average consumer?
Nestle, who is also professor of Nutrition Food Studies and Public Health at New York University, says the findings are important considering how widespread high fructose corn syrup has become in the last 20 years.
“It’s much, much cheaper than sucrose, which is the white sugar that goes on the table,” she says. “So starting in the 1980s, because the cost of sucrose is kept artificially high because of federal policy, everybody started using high fructose corn syrup. As a cheap substitute for sucrose, it costs about a third as much as sucrose did. And also it turned out to have very nice properties for certain kinds of foods. It has a nice water holding quality that works well in a lot of foods. So it’s put in absolutely everything.”
With so much high fructose corn syrup out there, it could be hard to know how to stay healthy. Nestle advises going easy on products with sugar added to them, and getting your fix of sweet treats from mother nature.
“My advice is always eat less, move more, eat plenty of fruits and vegetables, and don’t eat too much junk food,” she says. “And that would include foods that have high fructose corn syrup or sugar for that matter.”
Also on ScienCentral:
Sweet Tooth Gene, 6/3/08
Low Carb Science, 12/9/04
Junk Food Study, 12/31/04

Stumble |
Share on Facebook |
Tweet This |


September 2nd, 2008 at 4:23 pm (#)
Seems like there's more going on here. High fructose corn syrup also contains glucose, so it's not exactly a HFCS versus glucose comparison. And fructose is sweeter than other sugars, so you may be able to use less of it. I think the evils of HFCS are more related to desensitizing the body's cells to insulin (which causes type 2 diabetes) and liver problems–since it has to be metabolized in the liver, unlike some other sugars. But I'm not a nutritionist. Can anyone clarify this?
September 16th, 2008 at 2:10 am (#)
Technically, it was a fructose vs glucose comparison, not a HFCS vs glucose comparison. Given that the HFCS contains more fructose than glucose (which has none), one can extropolate that adding fructose to foods in any measure is likely to be more detrimental than adding glucose (or sucrose, no doubt).
It doesn't take a degree in nutrition, just an exercise in logic. You missed what the study was actually studying.
Fat desensitizes the body to insulin. Those with more fat are less likely to respond to insulin. If fructose causes more fat than glucose, then it follows that fructose would indirectly contribute to insulin resistance syndrome.
September 19th, 2008 at 12:55 pm (#)
Have you seen those new commercials advertising HFCS?? Apparently, it's not that bad “in moderation.” Amazing…
September 27th, 2008 at 6:07 pm (#)
thats so interesting
November 10th, 2008 at 3:58 pm (#)
[...] back to corn. Corn isn’t just what we feed the animals we eat, but it’s also in the sweeteners in soda, the artificial yellow coloring of a snack, and the fermented glucose in [...]