Comments on: LHC Unlikely to Swallow Earth

By: Justin

Justin — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:37:42 +0000

uummm…Ithought the earth will be destroyed by 3rd impact. That a big red planet double the size of Jupiter will squash earth…

By: r

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:52:15 +0000

Who do you think created us and all that exists? And why did there come about such troubles after a perfect world? And is there relief from all the troubles?

By: Jerico

Jerico — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 06:19:21 +0000

Maybe I have to elaborate more about christianity that had been linked towards roman empire as what Kevin had said. FYI Romans failed to be within the empirical definition of christianity, they use christianity as the tool for catholicism and if im not mistaken catholicism means universality. Roman empire before according to the history is in the struggle of widening its territory by conquering neighboring states and even in the Sout East Asia. They use christianity as the spearhead of there hiden agenda. What romans in the past centuries and even now so to speak are integrating PAGANISTIC beliefs as it is shown in their RITUALS and they rename their own creative integrations as christianity. Therefore, there is a profound misconceptions nowadays that connects christianity to roman infact NOT in the real sense. I think its time to correct that misconceptions.

By: Jerico

Jerico — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 06:07:11 +0000

Realy? I dont think so, i think its not harmful for us to consider some of the claims which you think hard to prove that is congruent to the point that you cannot justify easily why you are here in the world asking whats the purpose of your existence, if you tried to figure out why then you have to think for reasons to support why you exist. You cannot generalize christianity as saying that anybody who believes about Christ is a christian, christianity is not a word to refer a person who knows Christ but to a person who practice the teaching of Christ, but this is not only the case, christianity is not only by that, the pure meaning is in the core of definitions, diving to the most empirical definition that describes about christianity. Why I say so? It's because there are people that cliams they are christians indeed they are not within the empirical description of becoming a christian.

By: Kevin

Kevin — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 22:54:56 +0000

The problem with christianity is that it stifles the mind into believing a lot of fiction in a book that was assemble by a Roman Emperor. Go figure. This explains the reason why people follow corrupt, inept leaders like Bush

By: Shankar Jog

Shankar Jog — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:57:34 +0000

It is foolish to talk such thing as Goa created everything. There is no Goa other than in imagination of so called faithfuls/religious people. The fact is that God was created by men for their mental satisfaction. They can never find God as it is non-existant.

By: Inteligent Designite

Inteligent Designite — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:08:54 +0000

I have heard that the difference between God and a scientist is that God doesn't play at being a scientist. I'm pretty sure that the implication of the biblical story is that it was God who was speaking the universe into existence.

By: jim

jim — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 05:09:18 +0000

Derek, all I can say with any respect at all to you is,..you're an idiot. May the Creator of ALL things, Great and Small, have mercy on your ignorance.

By: Christ

Christ — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 04:03:11 +0000

Read the Urantia book, http://www.urantiabook.org and find out.

Christ Michael

By: john connore

john connore — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 18:59:08 +0000

I'm curious to hear the god squads comments on this experiment