Comments on: Top 10 End of The World Scenarios

By: cometogetherplease

cometogetherplease — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 01:20:13 +0000

No one can predict what exactly will happen, but we can prepare ourselves for an emergency situation. Something is going to happen in the near future and those who choose to ignore the warnings will ultimately pay the highest price. I hope for your sake and your families you heed this warning.

By: phentermine

phentermine — Sat, 26 Dec 2009 10:31:34 +0000

Hello.I am well into a boring sunday thanks for giving something to think about.This is a great story got me thinking,Thanks!.

By: joe

joe — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 04:02:46 +0000

i believe those are all good guesses and ansers. but i have one. the fact that due to extreme globel warming the flooding will be greater then anyone would expect and that meaning thats how the world will end. with mountain tops under water. lol

By: r.jensen

r.jensen — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:45:37 +0000

so the biggest worry would then be global warming or a severe pandemic attack via our own countries stupidity or other countries tampering with things they shouldn’t have played with in the first place.

By: Militarydoc

Militarydoc — Wed, 05 Aug 2009 01:20:40 +0000

All the tree huggers on this post, could cut their carbon footprint, but taking their last breath. Of all the possibilities listed above, some of which have happended in the past already, and you dorks want to talk about global warming. It is clear that some of you won’t survive this life when the going gets rough. Enjoy your reusable grocery bags and water bottles, your focus is misdirected.

By: Иван Павлюченко

Иван Павлюченко — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 04:12:55 +0000

Вот это да… Куча комментариев и совсем ни одного по делу

By: Al Fries

Al Fries — Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:25:47 +0000

I keep one thing in mind.
If a major city looses 99.99% there is still enough for a gene pool.
If we lost 99.9 % we would have the population of 2000 years ago.
There would be lots of room to archive our culture.

By: Bear

Bear — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:35:53 +0000

Heating, Driving, Melting there are few things today which actually need open flame and the release of CO2 amongst other gases.

If only we(and not just political will, since we decide which politician gets a job) would here and now decide to use wind/water for electricity, I mean seriously, for a factory even mediocre in size can afford to erect 1 or 2 2.5-3.0MW Turbines.
It does not even have to be “on site”.
Heck, they could be mandatory or at least the cost of the windmill itself delivered to the state to utilise for one(of hopefully many to come) windmill parks in a -for such purpose zoned area.The only expense that factory would ever receive(power-wise) would be yearly maintenance of the turbine(s).

Such factories should ofcourse be heavily relieved of power/pollution taxes(electricity-wise/CO2 kvote).

There are even fairly small turbines to use for private homes, small factories, high-rise buildings, there are even certain not yet patented techniques in harvesting power via the falling waste water/rainwater in highrise buildings.

Oh well, i guess i can keep day-dreaming about such things.
I just really hope we wont be sitting somewhere in space celebrating with a “cupcake in a cup”.

By: Mike

Mike — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:36:00 +0000

Even if there was, it would be global COOLING not colding.

GRAMMATICALLY DEFICIENT PERSON!!!!!!

By: Mike

Mike — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:31:24 +0000

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS GLOBAL COLDING!
THINK ABOUT THINGS YOU WRITE BEFORE YOU PRESS “SUBMIT”