Comments on: Hawaiian Heat http://www.sciencentral.com/video/2009/10/12/hawaiian-heat/ Making Sense of Science Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:34:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Muriel Plaut http://www.sciencentral.com/video/2009/10/12/hawaiian-heat/#comment-3033 Muriel Plaut Tue, 13 Dec 2011 22:56:22 +0000 http://www.sciencentral.com/video/?p=420#comment-3033 Mainly desired to post and see where you acquired your layout? I'm looking for one for my new wordpress blog and really like yours. Thanks. Mainly desired to post and see where you acquired your layout? I’m looking for one for my new wordpress blog and really like yours. Thanks.

]]> By: business security systems http://www.sciencentral.com/video/2009/10/12/hawaiian-heat/#comment-2693 business security systems Sun, 07 Aug 2011 19:19:55 +0000 http://www.sciencentral.com/video/?p=420#comment-2693 <strong>business security systems...</strong> I can't believe this actually is true: Hawaiian Heat | ScienCentral | Science Videos | Science News... business security systems…

I can’t believe this actually is true: Hawaiian Heat | ScienCentral | Science Videos | Science News…

]]> By: Chuck http://www.sciencentral.com/video/2009/10/12/hawaiian-heat/#comment-2654 Chuck Mon, 27 Jun 2011 02:39:16 +0000 http://www.sciencentral.com/video/?p=420#comment-2654 My sister says... "Jesus will come down and everything will be fine." My sister says… “Jesus will come down and everything will be fine.”

]]> By: Science News http://www.sciencentral.com/video/2009/10/12/hawaiian-heat/#comment-2636 Science News Thu, 02 Jun 2011 07:39:56 +0000 http://www.sciencentral.com/video/?p=420#comment-2636 I wish I could to go to Hawaii :( I wish I could to go to Hawaii :(

]]> By: Liberteque http://www.sciencentral.com/video/2009/10/12/hawaiian-heat/#comment-2492 Liberteque Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:03:59 +0000 http://www.sciencentral.com/video/?p=420#comment-2492 SilenCentral ring a bell? SilenCentral ring a bell?

]]> By: Liberteque http://www.sciencentral.com/video/2009/10/12/hawaiian-heat/#comment-2489 Liberteque Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:29:41 +0000 http://www.sciencentral.com/video/?p=420#comment-2489 I rest my case I rest my case

]]> By: Liberteque http://www.sciencentral.com/video/2009/10/12/hawaiian-heat/#comment-2484 Liberteque Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:36:54 +0000 http://www.sciencentral.com/video/?p=420#comment-2484 I was hoping on an intelligent response for all the questions Ike asked... What wrong with this picture? I was hoping on an intelligent response for all the questions Ike asked…

What wrong with this picture?

]]> By: Liberteque http://www.sciencentral.com/video/2009/10/12/hawaiian-heat/#comment-2482 Liberteque Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:25:04 +0000 http://www.sciencentral.com/video/?p=420#comment-2482 Have Ike has his answers please, or are his questions too complex, or outside the thinking box of scientists with tunnel vision.... Have Ike has his answers please, or are his questions too complex, or outside the thinking box of scientists with tunnel vision….

]]> By: ike http://www.sciencentral.com/video/2009/10/12/hawaiian-heat/#comment-2345 ike Tue, 27 Apr 2010 01:16:31 +0000 http://www.sciencentral.com/video/?p=420#comment-2345 What is the present ph? What ph were the corals grown is? Has the water been tested for the source of the decreased ph? Is it CO2, nitrogen acid, sulfur acids (from volcanoes)? She said the reefs are in GRAVE DANGER (in the distant future of course), yet offered no measurement of the decrease compared to an earlier time? Video is long on scare and short of proof. What is the present ph? What ph were the corals grown is? Has the water been tested for the source of the decreased ph? Is it CO2, nitrogen acid, sulfur acids (from volcanoes)? She said the reefs are in GRAVE DANGER (in the distant future of course), yet offered no measurement of the decrease compared to an earlier time? Video is long on scare and short of proof.

]]> By: ike http://www.sciencentral.com/video/2009/10/12/hawaiian-heat/#comment-2344 ike Tue, 27 Apr 2010 01:06:52 +0000 http://www.sciencentral.com/video/?p=420#comment-2344 Racktip Oddling I see a good series of valid questions that I posed were wasted on your puny brain. Read and agree or refute my claims, if you can offer proof or a good argument. NOBODY comprehends the complexity or magnitude, that's why they make widely variable predictions based on MODELS. That's why they say temps MAY be 2-10 deg F, areas MAY have more drought, rain, storms, etc. MAYBE is not definite. People try to treat the earth as a static "in a bottle" system .... it's not.... it's dynamical, chaotic and difficult to predict. Yet WE should act as if it's written in stone by MOTHER NATURE herself? You need to read my coments and do more research before you criticize me. Explain solar flux/storms/sunspots,CME's, earth's orbit, wobble, tilt, space dust, magnetic field, cosmic rays, ozone, dust and particulates/ bacterial cloud nuclei, albedo, ice quakes, volcanoes ...underwater and above ground, plant particulates and isoprene, forest denuding, rice paddies, lakes and reservoirs, coal fires and many more occurances on atmospheric conditions and chemistry .... and you tell me the ONLY thing we have to consider is MAN MADE CO2? And yes Steve ... we do need more information. And yes there are "natural" systems in place to take care of natural waste. But your logis is that there are NO systems to take care of "man's" waste. Fossil fuels are natural in source and at on time were "natural" CO2. We burn them and release the "natural" CO2 back into nature .... yet nature has no way to utilize it? Nature already has with measurable increase in plant bio-mass. Racktip Oddling I see a good series of valid questions that I posed were wasted on your puny brain. Read and agree or refute my claims, if you can offer proof or a good argument. NOBODY comprehends the complexity or magnitude, that’s why they make widely variable predictions based on MODELS. That’s why they say temps MAY be 2-10 deg F, areas MAY have more drought, rain, storms, etc. MAYBE is not definite. People try to treat the earth as a static “in a bottle” system …. it’s not…. it’s dynamical, chaotic and difficult to predict. Yet WE should act as if it’s written in stone by MOTHER NATURE herself? You need to read my coments and do more research before you criticize me. Explain solar flux/storms/sunspots,CME’s, earth’s orbit, wobble, tilt, space dust, magnetic field, cosmic rays, ozone, dust and particulates/ bacterial cloud nuclei, albedo, ice quakes, volcanoes …underwater and above ground, plant particulates and isoprene, forest denuding, rice paddies, lakes and reservoirs, coal fires and many more occurances on atmospheric conditions and chemistry …. and you tell me the ONLY thing we have to consider is MAN MADE CO2?

And yes Steve … we do need more information. And yes there are “natural” systems in place to take care of natural waste. But your logis is that there are NO systems to take care of “man’s” waste. Fossil fuels are natural in source and at on time were “natural” CO2. We burn them and release the “natural” CO2 back into nature …. yet nature has no way to utilize it? Nature already has with measurable increase in plant bio-mass.

]]>