ScienCentral News
environment general science genetics health and medicine space technology May 17, 2003 
home NOVA News Minutes archive login

is a production of
ScienCentral, Inc.
Making Sense of Science

Also of Interest
Good Fish, Bad Fish (video)

The Core (video)

Ocean Fishing Ban (video)

West Nile Airplanes (video)

Climate Change and Snow (video)

Tsunami Warning (video)

Strong Stuff (video)

Fishing for Trouble (video)

Sinking City (video)

Shifting Seas (video)

Harry Potter’s Owl (video)

Fallout Fears (video)

Cloned Cuisine (video)

Hurricane Heralds (video)

Andrew + 10 (video)

NOVA News Minutes
Visit the NOVA News Minutes archive.
ScienCentral News and Nature
Nature genome promo logo
Don’t miss Enter the Genome
our collaboration with Nature.
Best of the Web!
Popular Science Best of the Web 2000
Selected one of Popular Science’s 50 Best of the Web.
Get Email Updates
Write to us and we will send you an email when a new feature appears on the site.
Heavy Hurricanes (video)
July 19, 2001

Also on ScienCentral News

Old El Niño - Researchers have found a way to study the El Niños and La Niñas of the past, with the help of coral reefs. And a new study raises the question of whether the weather extremes are likely to continue, and even get worse. (10/25/00)

Storm Warnings - Brace yourself for more and stronger hurricanes. That’s the warning of one scientist who has studied geological records left behind by hurricanes. He concludes that we’ve been in a hurricane lull that is now ending. (6/13/00)

Elsewhere on the web

Hurricane Andrew

Stan Goldenberg’s Andrew experience

Chris Landsea (co-author)

The Saffir-Simpson hurricane scale


Is the recent rash of Atlantic hurricanes just a band of rogues or an army on the march?

A new study in this week’s journal Science says it’s the latter.

As this ScienCentral News video reports, it’s a dire forecast for the eastern United States and the Caribbean.

How can they be sure?

Do Goldenberg et al really have enough data to be confident of their forecast? In a "Perspectives" essay in Science, Lannart Bengtsson of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Germany concludes that they don’t. "The records are too short and incomplete to claim that the coastal United States may be in for a longer period of high hurricane activity," writes Bengtsson.

The report looks at two climate factors with a big impact on the numbers, and power, of hurricanes. Warmer sea surface temperatures tend to fuel Atlantic hurricanes, while large vertical wind shears can kill them. When the team compared long-term cycles of sea surface temperature and wind shear, they matched periods of low, and high, hurricane activity. Those long-term cycles "fluctuate on a very long timescale," Goldenberg says, "on the order of anywhere from say 30 to 60 or 80 years or so."

And Goldenberg says other sources of data convinced them that the cycle is real. "The overall hurricane activity in the Atlantic is reliable back to about the mid-40’s when consistent aircraft reconnaissance began. We linked that up to these fluctuations in sea surface temps. Well, the sea surface temperature cycles, that data is reliable back to the late 18-hundreds, so therefore we have almost 2 cycles. Well, that still may be a relatively short record. Well, we matched that up to other type of what we call proxy data, modeling data that extend back literally to the 16-hundreds and we see this consistent cycle go back," Goldenberg says.

Not enough funding?

Longterm forecasts don’t do much for a community in the path of a hurricane. That’s when NOAA’s tracking and intensity warnings guide lifesaving evacuations. NOAA scientists who warn that the threat is now high also agree that funding for this critical research is way too low.

Due to budget contraint, last year researchers did not fly into a single hurricane for the first time in almost 40 years. A letter prepared by the five living former directors of the National Hurricane Center describes the shortfall:

"Despite [its] achievements, base funding for Hurricane Research Division (HRD) has not increased for the last two decades and its purchasing power has been severely eroded by inflation and increased overhead costs. Because of the lack of funding, the scientific staff has decreased from 40 to 26 federal employees and will continue to decline without new financial support. Another consequence of inadequate funding is that HRD has not been able to upgrade crucial computer equipment that is necessary to expedite its research. Furthermore, key investigations of hurricane motion, rainfall distribution, and rapid intensification are slow to be transitioned to operations at the National Hurricane Center."

"Our funding is going down and down," Goldenberg says. "We are wondering if our lab is going to continue to exist. It’s that bad."

by Joyce Gramza

About Search Login Help Webmaster
ScienCentral News is a production of ScienCentral, Inc.
in collaboration with the Center for Science and the Media.
248 West 35th St., 17th Fl., NY, NY 10001 USA (212) 244-9577.
The contents of these WWW sites © ScienCentral, 2000-2003. All rights reserved.
The views expressed in this website are not necessarily those of the NSF.
NOVA News Minutes and NOVA are registered trademarks of WGBH Educational Foundation and are being used under license.